To maintain the highest standards of academic integrity and streamline the evaluation process, the Editorial Board of the Zanco Journal of Human Sciences strictly enforces an initial screening phase.
Zanco journal DOES NOT accept, review, or publish any manuscript that fails to meet the following prerequisites. Non-compliance will result in an immediate desk rejection without moving forward to peer review.
Manuscripts must rigidly adhere to the official Zanco Journal template, layout, font specifications, and referencing style. Submissions with incomplete metadata, poorly formatted reference lists, or missing mandatory sections will be rejected immediately.
Every submission must present innovative insights that actively advance the human sciences.
The paper must follow a coherent, logical academic structure. Regardless of the language track (Kurdish, Arabic, or English), it must be precise, clear, and free from pervasive grammatical errors or awkward phrasing. If a manuscript requires heavy linguistic editing to be understood, it will be rejected at the desk.
The research design must be transparent, valid, and fully justified. Authors must explicitly detail their data collection instruments, sample populations, theoretical frameworks, or analytical techniques. If the chosen methodology is vague, fundamentally flawed, or insufficient to support the study’s conclusions, the paper will not be sent to reviewers.
Investing time in formatting and language editing beforehand prevents unnecessary administrative delays.
Editorial Board