Peer Review Policy

Peer Review Policy

The Zanco Journal of Human Sciences uses a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of its published articles. Upon submission, the editorial team conducts an initial assessment of each manuscript to determine its suitability and relevance to the journal’s scope and compliance with submission guidelines and requirements.

Submitted manuscripts that meet the journal's criteria are then sent for peer review by experts in the field. The reviewers, who are selected for their expertise and independence, provide valuable and constructive feedback to the authors to improve the quality and clarity of their work.

After receiving feedback from reviewers, the editorial staff determine whether to accept, request revision, or reject the manuscript. Authors are, then, given the opportunity to respond to reviewers' suggestions and modify their work accordingly.

ZJHS is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and transparency throughout its peer review process assuring the reliability and credibility of the research it publishes.