The Impact of Online Learning Environment on Making Errors in Second Language Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.30.1.15Keywords:
Error Analysis, Online Learning, Second Language Acquisition.Abstract
Error analysis (EA) has long served as a valuable tool for examining the writing of second language learners by systematically identifying and interpreting their errors in spoken and written forms, since writing well requires effort and practice through experience in formal instructional settings. Therefore, practitioners should develop teaching methods and language skills when working with students’ language learning and acquisition. This article explores the role of online learning environments in second language learning (SLL) and the issues related to error analysis. This study collects, classifies, and analyzes the errors of second language learners' writing as it plays a vital role in language pedagogy. The outcome of using the error analysis approach provides a comprehensive understanding of the opportunities and challenges that learners face in the digital era. This paper examined written errors in online and face-to-face composition classes produced by sixty undergraduate students studying the English language at the College of Education at different universities in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. The results from the students’ errors in the online learning environment show 172 more errors compared to a traditional learning environment. The findings suggest that students are still exposed to challenges from the online learning environment in grasping grammatical structures as they work through writing skills. Therefore, based on these findings, it can be understood that students are facing limited interaction, insufficient feedback, and a lack of physical exposure to English language learners.
References
- Bitchener, J. and Knoch, U. (2008) ‘The value of incorporating error feedback in SLA’, Language Teaching Research, 12(3), pp. 409–431.
- Chik, A. (2014) ‘Digital gaming and language learning: Autonomy and community’, Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), pp. 85–100.
- Corder, S.P. (1967) ‘The significance of learners’ errors’, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(4), pp. 161–170.
- Dulay, H., Burt, M., and Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Fawaid, A., Raunaq, M.N. and Mustofa, M. (2022) ‘Error analysis of students’ comment writing in online learning at FLSP class’, IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 11(2), pp. 118–137.
- Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Li, S. (2010) ‘The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA’, Language Learning, 60(2), pp. 309–365.
- Maltte, D. (2019). Teaching students error analysis: A pathway to critical thinking [online]. Available at: https://learningfocused.com/teaching-students-error-analysis-a-pathway-to-critical-thinking/ (Accessed: 24 November 2024).
- Mustafa, P.O. and Al Bajalani, F.R.H. (2024) ‘EFL university students’ attitudes towards the effect of implementing contextualized grammar teaching on developing their writing skills’, Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 28(SpB), pp. 536–550.
- Nassaji, H. (2015) ‘Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis’, Language Teaching Research, 19(2), pp. 129–132.
- Richards, J.C. (2015). Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
- Saville-Troike, M. (2005). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Selinker, L. (1972) ‘Interlanguage’, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), pp. 209–231.
- Sermsook, K., Liamnimit, J. and Pochakorn, R. (2017) ‘An analysis of errors in written English sentences: A case study of Thai EFL students’, English Language Teaching, 10(3), pp. 101–110.
- Truscott, J. (1996) ‘The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes’, Language Learning, 46(2), pp. 327–369.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sheelan Shakir Kadir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

