Exploring the Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Pair Work in the Foreign Language Learning Classrooms at Salahaddin University-Erbil
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.4.17##semicolon##
Pair Work, Group Work, Whole Class Lessons, Lockstep Class, Traditional Class, Individual Work.پوختە
پوختە
ئەم توێژینەوەیە بەدواداچوون بۆ لایەنە باش و خراپەکانی بەکارهێنانی کاری جووت یان گروپی لە پۆلەکانی فێربوونی زمانی دووەم لە زانکۆکانی کوردستان دەکات. ئامانجی توێژینەوەکە دیاریکردنی کاریگەری جووتە کارکردن بوو لەسەر ئارەزووەکانی خوێندکاران، و دەستکاریکردنی هەڵوێستەکانیان بەرامبەر بە کاریگەرییەکانی بەکارهێنانی جووتە لە چالاکییەکاندا. کۆمەڵێک پرسیارنامە بۆ ٤٧ خوێندکاری بەشی ئینگلیزی لە کۆلێژی پەروەردەی بنەڕەتی-زانکۆی سەڵاحەدین بۆ ساڵی خوێندنی ٢٠٢٢-٢٠٢٤ ئامادهكرا. دوای شیکردنەوەی ئەنجامی پرسیارنامەکان, دەرکەوت کە هەڵوێستی خوێندکاران باشتر بووە و زیاتر ئەرێنی بوون سەبارەت بە چالاکییەکانی کاری جووت و زۆر حەزیان لێیە. وه ههروهها سەرنجی سەرەکی ئەم توێژینەوەیە لەسەر لایەنە باش و خراپەکانی و ئامانجەکانی جووتە کارکردنە، هەروەها ئەو تەحەددایانەی کە خوێندکاران ڕووبەڕووی دەبنەوە لە کاتی ئەنجامدانی چالاکییەکانی کارکردنی جووتدا. لە ئەنجامی ئەم توێژینەوەیەدا, دەتوانرێت بڵێین کە خوێندکاران هەست بە ئاسوودەیی دەکەن لە بەکارهێنانی تێکەڵەیەک لە کاری جووت لەگەڵ گفتوگۆی گروپی بچووک بۆ بهكارهێنانى تواناى زمان..
سەرچاوەکان
- Al-Badi, M. (2006). EFL teachers' use of group work in Omani basic educaion schools. MA Thesis, Sultan Qaboos University.
- Al-Sheedi, M. and Batinah, R. (2009) “Teachers’ beliefs about using group work in Basic Education” in Borg, S., 140-148.
- Baines, E., P. Blatchford and P. Kutnick. (2009) Promoting Effective Group Work in the Primary Classroom. London: Routledge.
- Bassano, S. (2003) Helping ESL Students Remember to Speak English During Group Work.
- TESOL Journal. 12.1 (2003): 35-36.
- Blatchford, P., Goldstein, H., & Mortimore, P. (1998). Research on class size effects: A critique of methods and a way forward. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(8), 691-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(98)00058-5.
-Brown, J. (2001) Using Surveys in Language Programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bryson, E. (2007) Effectiveness of Working Individually Versus Cooperative Groups: A Classroom-Based Research Project. MA. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
- Byrne, D. (1989) Techniques of Classroom Interaction. Longman Group UK Limited.
- Çakmak, M. (2009) “The Perceptions of Student Teachers about the Effects of Class Size with Regard to Effective Teaching Process” The Qualitative Report, 14:3, 395-408.
- Carruthers, J. (1990) "A Rationale for the Use of Semi-structured Interviews" Journal of Educational Administration, 28:1, 63-68.
- Dunne, S. (1995) Interviewing Techniques for Writers and Researchers. London: A. and C. Black.
- Filatova, O. A. (2015). “Cultural Attributes of Students to Make Student-Centered Approach Successful”. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), PP.20-24.
- Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 933.
- Gillham, B. (2000) Developing a Questionnaire. London: Continuum.
- Girden, E. (1996) Evaluating Research Articles: From Start to Finish. London: SAGE Publications.
- Granström, K. (2006). Group phenomena and classroom management in Sweden. In C. M. Evertson, & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. (pp. 1141–1160) Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.
- Harmer, J. (2001) Course books: a human, cultural and linguistic disaster? Modern English Teacher, 10(3), 5-10.
- Harmer, J. (2007) The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman.
- Hill, D. A. (2004). Pairwork and Groupwork [online], New Ideas in Language Education.
- Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Holubec, E. J. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom (pp. 4-7). Boston, MA, USA: Allyn and BaconPublishing.
- Long, M. H. and Porter, P. A. (1985). “Group work, Interlanguage Talk, and Second Language Acquisition”. TESOL quarterly, 19(2), PP.207-228.
- Lumpe, A.T., & Haney, J.J. (1998). Science teachers’ beliefs and intentions regarding the use of cooperative learning. School Science and Mathematics, 3, 123–135,
- Maher, K. M. (2012). Exploring Pair Work in a Communicative Classroom. NEAR Language Education Conference.
- Mamary, A. & Rowe, l.A. (1985). Flexible and heterogeneous instructional arrngements tofacilitate mastery learning, In J. Hsia (Ed), Improving student achievement throughmastery larning programs, Josey-Bass Publishers.
- McDonough, J. and Christopher, S. (2003) Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher’s Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
- McDonough, J. and S. McDonough (1997) Research Methods for English Language Teachers. London: Arnold.
- Nunan, D. (1988). “Principles for designing language teaching materials.” Guidelines10, 1-24. Singapore: SEAMEO RELC.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- Pugach, M.C., & Johnson, L.J. (1995). Collaborative practitioner’s collaborative school (p.178). Denver, Colorado, USA: Love Company Publishing.
- Richardson, P., A. Goodwin, and E. Vine (2011) Research Methods and Design in Psychology. Exeter, Learning Matters.
- Skrzynski, H. (2005). Advantages and Disadvantages of Pair work and Group work in the class.
- Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Yule G., Macdonald D. (1990). Resolving referential conflicts in L2 Interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40, 539–556.
##submission.downloads##
بڵاو کرایەوە
چۆنییەتی بەکارهێنانی سەرچاوە
ژمارە
بەش
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##
