The Use of Active Learning Strategies to Foster Effective Teaching in Higher Education Institutions

Authors

  • Aryan Hussein Sulaiman Dzaiy Department of Educational and Psychological Counseling, College of Education, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Ebil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Saman Ahmed Abdullah Department of Educational and Psychological Counseling, College of Education, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Ebil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.4.18

Keywords:

Active learning, Student engagement, Higher education, Teaching methods, Learning outcomes.

Abstract

Active learning techniques are increasingly being adopted in higher education to foster student engagement and improve learning outcomes. This paper critically examines active learning strategies and their impacts on undergraduate teaching effectiveness. A comprehensive review of the literature provides defines a precise definition of active learning and succinctly summarizes key techniques, including like collaborative exercises, problem-based learning, discussions, simulations, and games. The theoretical basis foundation highlights constructivist and social learning principles. Empirical studies showcased in the literature demonstrate that active learning improves academic achievement, conceptual understanding, critical thinking, motivation, and inclusiveness compared to traditional passive lecture formatss. Practical implementation recommendations focus on the gradual integration of active learning, alignment to with specific learning objectives, scaffolding of student participation, and the incorporation of continuous assessment. Despite challenges of related to student resistance, instructor skills, and resource constraintss, the evidence underscores the active learning's essential role in of active learning in delivering high-quality undergraduate education given it demonstrated cognitive and non-cognitive benefits for diverse learners.

References

- Addo, P. N., Doffou, S., Joubert, L., & Reid, S. (2019). Student-led team learning of organic chemistry in college. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48(5), 58-63.

- Active Learning Project. (2022). Active learning self-evaluation. University of Michigan Center for Research on Learning and Teaching. https://www.crlt.umich.edu/activelearningproject/alselfevaluation

- Allen, D. D., Donham, R. S., & Bernhardt, S. A. (2011). Problem based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.465

- Andrews, T. M., Leonard, M. J., Colgrove, C. A., & Kalinowski, S. T. (2011). Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061

- Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. Jossey-Bass.

- Armstrong, N., Chang, S. M., & Brickman, M. (2007). Cooperative learning in industrial-sized biology classes. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-11-0199

- Barkley, E. F. (2009). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.

- Barkley, E. F., Major, C. H. (2016). Learning assessment techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.

- Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672

- Bates, S., & Galloway, R. (2012). The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: a case study. Proceedings of the HEA STEM Learning and Teaching Conference, Birmingham, UK, 12 Apr 2012.

- Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE–ERIC Higher Education Rep. No. 1). The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

- Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies: Increasing evidence-based teaching in STEM education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20040

- Braxton, J. M., Jones, W. A., Hirschy, A. S., & Hartley, H. V., III. (2008). The role of active learning in college student persistence. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(115), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.326

- Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and... tensions with professional identity? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163

- Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205

- Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students' experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387724

- Cervantes, L. (2022). Poet Seers. https://www.poetseers.org/the-poetseers/lorna-dee-cervantes/

- Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x

- Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3, 7.

- Cleveland, L. M., Olimpo, J. T., & DeChenne-Peters, S. E. (2021). Investigating the relationships between teaching practices, course grades, and persistence in undergraduate STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00290-9

- Cotner, S., Loper, J., Walker, J. D., & Brooks, D. C. (2013). “It’s not you, it’s the room”—Are the high-tech, active learning classrooms worth it? Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(6), 82-88.

- Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862–864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783

- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Collier Macmillan.

- Eagan, M. K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Lozano, J. B., Aragon, M. C., Suchard, M. R., & Hurtado, S. (2014). Undergraduate teaching faculty: The 2013–2014 HERI faculty survey. Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA.

- Ebert-May, D., Derting, T. L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., & Jardeleza, S. E. (2011). What we say is not what we do: Effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. BioScience, 61(7), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.7.9

- Eddy, S. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050

- Eison, J. (2010). Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning. Books@Ovid.

- Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (2015). Understanding student learning (Routledge revivals). Routledge.

- Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

- Finelli, C. J., Daly, S. R., & Richardson, K. M. (2014). Bridging the research‐to‐practice gap: Designing an institutional change plan using local evidence. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 331-361. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20042

- Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

- Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y

- Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.3.020102

- Indiana University School of Education Center for Postsecondary Research (2022). NSSE - National Survey of Student Engagement. http://nsse.indiana.edu/

- Kilgo, C. A., Sheets, J. K. E., & Pascarella, E. T. (2015). The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education, 69(4), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z

- King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781

- Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1187/05-06-0082

- Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: what is it? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092

- Lane, E. S., & Harris, S. E. (2015). A new tool for measuring student behavioral engagement in large university classes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(6), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst15_044_06_83

- Lateef, F. (2010). Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock, 3(4), 348-352. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.70743

- Loes, C. N., & Pascarella, E. T. (2015). The benefits of good teaching extend beyond course achievement. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i2.13167

- Lumpkin, A., Achen, R. M., & Dodd, R. K. (2015). Student perceptions of active learning. College Student Journal, 49(1), 121-133.

- Maloney, E., & Kim, J. (2021). An update on online learning and the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Researcher, 50(9), 665–669. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x211047857

- McConnell, D. A., Chapman, L., Czajka, C. D., Jones, J. P., Ryker, K. D., & Wiggen, J. (2017). Instructional utility and learning efficacy of common active learning strategies. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 604-625. https://doi.org/10.5408/17-249.1

- Michael, J. (2006). Where's the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006

- Michael, J. A., & Modell, H. I. (2003). Active learning in secondary and college science classrooms: A working model for helping the learner to learn. Routledge.

- Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team‐based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(116), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.330

- Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9(3), 85.

- Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-04-0063

- Niemi, H. (2002). Active learning—a cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 763-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00042-2

- Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. School Field, 7(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318

- Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. John Wiley & Sons.

- Nilson, L. B., & Goodson, L. A. (2018). Online teaching at its best: Merging instructional design with teaching and learning research. John Wiley & Sons.

- Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7610196

- Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533

- Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

- Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.14307/JFCS105.2.12

- Roy, A., & Shank, C. (2020). Using debates to foster critical thinking and student engagement in a large political science class. Journal of Political Science Education, 17(4), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2020.1737641

- SALG. (2022). Student Assessment of their Learning Gains. https://www.salgsite.org/

- Seidel, S. B., & Tanner, K. D. (2013). “What if students revolt?”—Considering student resistance: Origins, options, and opportunities for investigation. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 586-595. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-13-09-0190

- Shimazoe, J., & Aldrich, H. (2010). Group work can be gratifying: Understanding & overcoming resistance to cooperative learning. College Teaching, 58(2), 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567581003705806

- Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154

- Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Krauter, K., & Knight, J. K. (2011). Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-08-0101

- Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2

- Sunal, D. W., Hodges, J., Sunal, C. S., Whitaker, K. W., Freeman, L. M., Edwards, L., Johnston, R. A., & Odell, M. (2001). Teaching science in higher education: Faculty professional development and barriers to change. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 246-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb17888.x

- Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. John Wiley & Sons.

- Theobald, E. J., Eddy, S. L., Grunspan, D. Z., Wiggins, B. L., & Crowe, A. J. (2017). Student perception of group dynamics predicts individual performance: Comfort and equity matter. PLOS ONE, 12(7), e0181336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181336

- Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintron, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L., 2nd, Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., Lowe, A., ... & Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117

- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Harvard University Press.

- Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 6-28. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1061

- Weimer, M. (2016). Active learning vs. covering content. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professor-blog/active-learning-vs-covering-content/

- Weltman, D., & Whiteside, M. (2010). Comparing the effectiveness of traditional and active learning methods in business statistics: Convergence to the mean. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2010.11889492

- Wieman, C., & Gilbert, S. (2014). The teaching practices inventory: A new tool for characterizing college and university teaching in mathematics and science. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-02-0023

- Wilke, R. R. (2003). The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a human physiology course for nonmajors. Advances in Physiology Education, 27(4), 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00003.2002

- Wolff, B., Wood-Kustanowitz, A., & Ashkenazi, J. M. (2015). Student performance at a community college: Mode of delivery, employment, and academic skills as predictors of success. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(4).

- Wurdinger, S., & Allison, P. (2017). Faculty perceptions and use of experiential learning in higher education. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1278

- Yuretich, R. F. (2003). Encouraging critical thinking: Measuring skills in large introductory science classes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(3), 40-46.

- Youl, D., George, D., Dekkers, A., Howard, S., Simonis, R., Docker, L., Gardner, M., & Wasserman, J. (2005). The impact of an embedded problem-solving based learning approach in a research methods unit. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2(1), 9. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol2/iss1/9

- Young, M. S., Robinson, S., & Alberts, P. (2009). Students pay attention! Combating the vigilance decrement to improve learning during lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408100194

Published

2024-08-15

How to Cite

Dzaiy , A. H. S. ., & Abdullah , S. A. . (2024). The Use of Active Learning Strategies to Foster Effective Teaching in Higher Education Institutions . Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 28(4), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.4.18

Issue

Section

Original Articles