Formula Diversity of Verbs according to Ibrahim al-Samarrai a Study of the verb types between Criticism and Guidance

Abstract

        This research deals with an important characteristic of the features of the morphological lesson of Dr. Ibrahim Al-Samarrai, who is considered one of the pioneers of the Arabic language in the modern era. He enriched the Arabic library with a multitude of serious scientific studies during his career that extended for more than half a century. An audible echo among scholars between supporters and opponents. Meanwhile, he did not hold back to find out linguistic issues, especially morphological issues by rejecting, accepting, excluding and leaving behind.

       Accordingly, we have decided to highlight some of these opinions accompanied by innovative ideas, accurate scientific directives, and conclusions observed with linguistic creativity. So, one of the parts of his study was included namely, (formal diversity of verbs at Ibrahim Al-Samarrai - a study in the verb types between criticism and guidance) - of the verb and its divisions according to his scientific approach to the morphological lesson.

       Thus, the research came to address this diversity in terms of verb types and to be distributed among four types, which are: (the types of the triple verb, the verbs between the weak and the sick, the quadripartite verbs, and the estimated weights). We engrave all this in the light of the theory of modern exchange, with the mention of the scientific rooting of each issue among the ancients and the moderns, and then a statement of the opinion of al-Samarrai in it with his criticism of it through his directives and analyzes between acceptance and rejection, including the sources and references we have adopted.

       As a result, it has been found that the al-Samarrai has distinguished opinions on morphological issues characterized by savvy and objectivity, and in many of them he hit the nail on the head, because his descriptive view and his comparative archaeological background on which he built his ideas in morphology made him a piercing and sound view in analysis and guidance, but this did not prevent him from straying from the truth in some of them.