Exploring the Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Pair Work in the Foreign Language Learning Classrooms at Salahaddin University-Erbil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.4.17Keywords:
Pair Work, Group Work, Whole Class Lessons, Lockstep Class, Traditional Class, Individual Work.Abstract
This paper examines the pros and cons of using pair work in foreign language learning classes at Salahaddin University. The objective of the research is to determine the impact of working in pairs on students' preferences and to modify their attitudes toward the effects of using pairs in activities. For the academic year 2023–2024, a set of questionnaires was made and 47 students took part in it in the English Language department of Salahaddin University-Erbil College of Basic Education. Questionnaires and audio-recorded interviews were used to collect the data. Following an analysis of the survey responses, it was found that students' attitudes had improved and they were more positive about the pair work activities and were very interested in them. However, the main focus of this paper is on the pros, cons, and objectives of working pairs, as well as the challenges that students face when performing pair work activities. As a result of this study, it can be concluded that the students feel comfortable using a mix of pair work with small group discussions for language production. Therefore, the study found that pair work gives individual students more time and opportunity to use their own language, speak and share their own thoughts and ideas. Also, the student becomes more confident in their language learning and can manage their tasks on their own.
References
- Al-Badi, M. (2006). EFL teachers' use of group work in Omani basic educaion schools. MA Thesis, Sultan Qaboos University.
- Al-Sheedi, M. and Batinah, R. (2009) “Teachers’ beliefs about using group work in Basic Education” in Borg, S., 140-148.
- Baines, E., P. Blatchford and P. Kutnick. (2009) Promoting Effective Group Work in the Primary Classroom. London: Routledge.
- Bassano, S. (2003) Helping ESL Students Remember to Speak English During Group Work.
- TESOL Journal. 12.1 (2003): 35-36.
- Blatchford, P., Goldstein, H., & Mortimore, P. (1998). Research on class size effects: A critique of methods and a way forward. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(8), 691-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(98)00058-5.
-Brown, J. (2001) Using Surveys in Language Programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bryson, E. (2007) Effectiveness of Working Individually Versus Cooperative Groups: A Classroom-Based Research Project. MA. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
- Byrne, D. (1989) Techniques of Classroom Interaction. Longman Group UK Limited.
- Çakmak, M. (2009) “The Perceptions of Student Teachers about the Effects of Class Size with Regard to Effective Teaching Process” The Qualitative Report, 14:3, 395-408.
- Carruthers, J. (1990) "A Rationale for the Use of Semi-structured Interviews" Journal of Educational Administration, 28:1, 63-68.
- Dunne, S. (1995) Interviewing Techniques for Writers and Researchers. London: A. and C. Black.
- Filatova, O. A. (2015). “Cultural Attributes of Students to Make Student-Centered Approach Successful”. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), PP.20-24.
- Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 933.
- Gillham, B. (2000) Developing a Questionnaire. London: Continuum.
- Girden, E. (1996) Evaluating Research Articles: From Start to Finish. London: SAGE Publications.
- Granström, K. (2006). Group phenomena and classroom management in Sweden. In C. M. Evertson, & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. (pp. 1141–1160) Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.
- Harmer, J. (2001) Course books: a human, cultural and linguistic disaster? Modern English Teacher, 10(3), 5-10.
- Harmer, J. (2007) The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman.
- Hill, D. A. (2004). Pairwork and Groupwork [online], New Ideas in Language Education.
- Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Holubec, E. J. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom (pp. 4-7). Boston, MA, USA: Allyn and BaconPublishing.
- Long, M. H. and Porter, P. A. (1985). “Group work, Interlanguage Talk, and Second Language Acquisition”. TESOL quarterly, 19(2), PP.207-228.
- Lumpe, A.T., & Haney, J.J. (1998). Science teachers’ beliefs and intentions regarding the use of cooperative learning. School Science and Mathematics, 3, 123–135,
- Maher, K. M. (2012). Exploring Pair Work in a Communicative Classroom. NEAR Language Education Conference.
- Mamary, A. & Rowe, l.A. (1985). Flexible and heterogeneous instructional arrngements tofacilitate mastery learning, In J. Hsia (Ed), Improving student achievement throughmastery larning programs, Josey-Bass Publishers.
- McDonough, J. and Christopher, S. (2003) Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher’s Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
- McDonough, J. and S. McDonough (1997) Research Methods for English Language Teachers. London: Arnold.
- Nunan, D. (1988). “Principles for designing language teaching materials.” Guidelines10, 1-24. Singapore: SEAMEO RELC.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- Pugach, M.C., & Johnson, L.J. (1995). Collaborative practitioner’s collaborative school (p.178). Denver, Colorado, USA: Love Company Publishing.
- Richardson, P., A. Goodwin, and E. Vine (2011) Research Methods and Design in Psychology. Exeter, Learning Matters.
- Skrzynski, H. (2005). Advantages and Disadvantages of Pair work and Group work in the class.
- Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Yule G., Macdonald D. (1990). Resolving referential conflicts in L2 Interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40, 539–556.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Qani Nasih Najim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
