Political Campaign Rhetoric and Its Influence on Public Voting: A Macrostructure Analysis of Kurdistan’s 2024 Elections

Authors

  • Dilgash Mohammed Salih Tayib Department of English, College of Languages, University of Duhok- Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Haval Ismail Ahmad Simo Department of Translation, College of Languages, University of Duhok- Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Adil Ahmed Abdulazeez Department of Translation, College of Languages, University of Duhok- Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.29.5.14

Keywords:

CDA, Political Discourse, Macrostructure, Ideology, power

Abstract

Political campaign rhetoric plays a key role in shaping voter behavior in the Kurdistan Region. This study examines the 2024 elections, focusing on rhetorical strategies in speeches and materials that aimed to evoke emotions and reinforce group identity. It employs critical discourse analysis to examine political discourse in the 2024 Kurdistan elections, emphasizing its role in reinforcing power structures and shaping public opinion. It aims to uncover themes related to identity, governance, ethnicity, and power, and evaluate the influence of the discourse of campaigns on public opinion. The data of the study consists of excerpts of speeches delivered by leaders of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, and the New Generation Movement. Van Dijk’s macrostructural model was adopted to examine how political discourse creates ideological meanings and shows power relationships, following a qualitative approach. The study's findings show that each party uses strategic narratives to legitimize its power and undermine its opponents. They shape the discussion by using emotional appeals, claims about identity, and accusations of dictatorship. These strategies influence how voters perceive and behave, either by strengthening loyalty, fostering distrust, or advocating for change. The study concludes that language plays a crucial role in political influence in Kurdistan. Election discourse reflects deeper societal conflicts and power struggles. Critical discourse analysis highlights how political texts construct legitimacy, challenge opposition, and shape public awareness. This research offers valuable insights into political communication in divided societies and enhances the application of critical discourse analysis in electoral contexts throughout the Middle East.

References

Ayyad, A., 2012. Uncovering ideology in translation: A case study of Arabic and Hebrew translations of the ‘Roadmap Plan’. Journal of Language and Politics, 11, pp.250–272.

- Baranov, A.N. and Kazakevich, E.Q., 1991. Parliamentary debates: traditions and innovations. Znanie.

- Baris, H., 2020. Radical democracy and self-governance in Kurdistan. [online] E-International Relations. Available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2020/12/15/radical-democracy-and-self-governance-in-kurdistan/ [Accessed 24 Apr. 2025].

- Billig, M. 1996. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Blassnig, S., Ernst, N., Engesser, S. and Esser, F., 2019. Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 22, pp.554–571.

- Chilton, P. and Schäffner, C., 1997. Discourse and politics. In: T.A. van Dijk, ed. Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage, pp.206–230.

- Chilton, P. 2004. Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

- Fairclough, N., 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.

- Fairclough, N., 2003. Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

- Glavaš, D., 2017. Political advertising and media campaign during the pre-election period: A comparative study. OSCE.

- Gunter, M.M., 2008. The Kurds ascending: The evolving solution to the Kurdish problem in Iraq and Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

- Gunter, M.M., 2011. The Kurds: A modern history. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers.

- Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., 2000. Civil political discourse in a democracy: The contribution of psychology. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 6, pp.291–317.

- KhosraviNik, M., 2017. Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). Critical Discourse Studies, 14, pp.247–255.

- King, M., 1999. Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr: The power of nonviolent action. Cultures of Peace Series. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

- Natali, D., 2010. The Kurdish quasi-state: Development and dependency in post-Gulf War Iraq. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

- NPR, 2025. Election 2008: Transcript of Barack Obama's victory speech.

- Prifti, B., 2017. US foreign policy in the Middle East: The case for continuity. Macmillan.

- Richards, J.C. and Schmidt, R., 2010. Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. 4th ed. London: Routledge.

- Saeed, B. (2024). Critical Discourse Analysis of Ideology in Judy Blume’s ‘Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing’, Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 28(2), pp. 343–357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.2.20 (Accessed: 26 March 2025).

- Salih, M.A., 2020. New generation movement and the rise of populist opposition in Iraqi Kurdistan. Middle East Institute.

- Shapiro, A., 2003. Iraq and the United States: The road to war. Morningside Center for Teaching Social Responsibility.

- Stansfield, G., 2013. The political development of the Kurds in Iraq and Turkey. In: The Kurdish question revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History, 2009. History resources: John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address, 1961.

- The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History, 2009. History resources: Franklin D. Roosevelt’s first inauguration, 1933.

- Thomas, R., 2022. Why the government is the problem, not the solution. Toronto Sun.

- Trosborg, A., 1997. Text typology and translation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

- van Dijk, T.A., 1980. Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

- van Dijk, T.A., 1985. Handbook of discourse analysis: Discourse analysis in society. Orlando: Academic Press.

- van Dijk, T.A., 1998a. What is political discourse analysis? In: J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen, eds. Political linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp.11–52.

- van Dijk, T.A. 1998b. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.

- van Dijk, T.A., 2006. Politics, ideology, and discourse. In: K. Brown, ed. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, pp.728–740.

- van Dijk, T.A., 2013. Ideology and discourse. In: M. Freeden, L.T. Sargent and M. Stears, eds. The Oxford handbook of political ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.175–196.

- Wardhana, I.G.N.P., Christian, I.B., Dewi, N.L.D.S. and Utami, G.W.N., 2022. Rhetorical analysis of the speech “We Shall Fight On The Beaches” By Winston Churchill. Journal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 8(2).

- West, J., 2024. Lessons in emotional appeal from Nixon’s Checkers speech. Media Shower. Available at: https://mediashower.com/blog/richard-nixon-checkers-speech/ [Accessed 24 Apr. 2025].

- Widdowson, H.G., 2007. Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., 2001. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.

Published

2025-10-15

How to Cite

Dilgash Mohammed Salih Tayib, Haval Ismail Ahmad Simo, & Adil Ahmed Abdulazeez. (2025). Political Campaign Rhetoric and Its Influence on Public Voting: A Macrostructure Analysis of Kurdistan’s 2024 Elections. Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 29(5), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.29.5.14

Issue

Section

Original Articles