Complex Symbols in English and Kurdish Grammar

Authors

  • Dilovan Sayfuddin Saady English of Department, College of Education, Salahaddin University-Erbil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.27.5.16

Keywords:

/, Keywords: complex symbol, category, inherent , selectional and subcategorization features

Abstract

 A group of lexical items which are stored in the lexicon in a form of some symbols are called complex symbols .This research attempts to deal with transformational grammar relating to complex symbols. Complex symbol is a morpheme with a set of semantic and syntactic features. These features are :category ,inherent ,selectional and subcategorization features . As far as the literature review for this study ,this topic has not been written about by any researcher . It may not only be significant for a researcher to write about a topic which had been conducted in a way different from the way he is writing about .But it is also important for a researcher to write about those topics that have not been researched yet. This is a descriptive and qualitative  study .Finally ,it is concluded that as far as subcategorization feature , in Kurdish language ditransitive verbs are not subcategorised for two NP complements but it is for an NP and a Prep. P .In English language it is. In idioms of both Kurdish and English languages  ,selectional restrictions do not work and have no role. The inherent feature in Kurdish language seems to be similar to that of English language by assigning semantic roles to the lexical items.

References

Adetuyi Chris A. and Fidelis ,Olatayo O(2016).’International Journal of English Language and Communication Studies.’ Key Concepts in Transformational Generative Grammar.VOL 2 NO 2 ISSN 2545-5702

Barwary M.Salih.(2004).Topics in Government and Binding Theory with Refernece to English and Kurdish. An unpublished Dissertation

Brown and Miller(1999). Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories.Elsevier Science: Great Britain

Bussmann,H.(1996).Routledge Dictionary of language and Linguistics. Thomson publishing company.

Chomsky,N (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding . Dordrecht:Foris

Crystal,David.(2003).A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics.5th ed. UK

Fattah,M Maruf(2014). A Generative Grammar of Kurdish .

Fromkin ,V,Robert and Nina .(2003).An Introduction to Language .USA :Heinle

Jukul A.Mahmood .(2008).”Case Theory in Kurdish”. Zanko Journal .No.37 Hawler

Khoshnaw,Sh.Hussein and Qadir Sh.Mirza.(2010). Lekolinawa Zmanawanyakan. Rozhhalat printing press: Hawler

Malmkjaer(2006). The Linguistics Encyclopedia.Routledge Curzon: London and New York

Matthews.P.H(2007).Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford University Press: Great Britain

Parker and Riley(2005).Linguistics for Non-Linguists. USA

Spolsky,B. (1999).Concise Encyclopedia of Educational Linguistics. Elsevier science: Great Britain

Stork and Hartmann.(1971).Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.Applied science publishers, Great Britain

Trask,R.L.(2007).Language and Linguistics. 2nd ed. Great Britain: Stockwell

Wlya,H. (2009).Paywandya Ronanyakany Nwandna Syntaksyakan. Khany printing press:Duhok

www.silewpl/2006/-006.

Published

2023-10-15

How to Cite

Sayfuddin Saady, D. (2023). Complex Symbols in English and Kurdish Grammar: . Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 27(5), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.27.5.16

Issue

Section

Articles