Interactive effect of irrigation strategies and mulching on yield, water use efficiency and crop response factor of maize (Zea mays L.) in a semiarid climate

Authors

  • Rekawt Rahman Ismaiel Dep. field crops and medical plant, College of agricultural Engineering Sciences, Salahaddin University, Erbil, Iraq
  • Sherwan Ismail Towfiq College of agriculture, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Iraq
  • Tariq hama Karim KakaHama Faculty of Engineering, Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21271/ZJPAS.35.3.9

Keywords:

Deficit irrigation, mulching, Maize water use efficiency, crop response factor

Abstract

     With growing water scarcity and increasing competition for water, there will be more need for development of sustainable and efficient irrigation strategies, especially in areas that are arid and semi-arid. The adoption of other practices In conjunction with deficit irrigation techniques, further enhance both crop yield and the effectiveness of its irrigation. Accordingly, a study was initiated following a factorial experiment in randomized complete block design with three replications to evaluate the interactive effect of deficit irrigation (DI) and type of mulching (M) on yield, irrigation water use efficiency and crop response factor for corn during the growing season of 2021. The deficit irrigation encompassed three strategies:  1.0 of full irrigation supply (100%FI), 0.75 of full irrigation supply (75 %FI) and 0.5 of full irrigation supply (50% FI) and   mulching included: no mulch (M1), wheat straw mulching (M2) and plastic mulching (M3). The results indicated that irrespective of mulch type the yield increased linearly as there is an increase in total Amount of water required. It was also noticed that there was a steady increase irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) with a decrease in the amount of applied water.  Overall, there was an improvement in IWUE upon mulching. The treatment combination M3I3 offered the highest water use efficiency.  Under all mulching types, the ky –values were less than 1.0, indicating   that DI combined with M is an effective and practical management strategy to combat water shortage in the study location. Furthermore, crop sensitivity to drought tended to decrease with mulching.

References

Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig. Drain, Paper No. 56. FAO. Rome, Italy. 300pp. 1998.

Araya, A., Stroosnijder, L., Girmay, G., and Keesstra, SD. (2011). Crop coefficient, yield response to water stress and water productivity of teff. Agricultural Water Management, 98: 775–783.

Cakir, R. (2004). Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of maize. Field Crops Research, 89(1), 1–16.

Casierra-Posada, F.; Fonseca, E.; Vaughan, G. Fruit quality in strawberry (Fragaria sp.) grown on colored plastic mulch. Agron. Colomb. 2011, 29, 407–413.

Chen, R., W. Cheng, J. Cui, J. Liao, H. Fan, Z. Zheng and F. Ma. (2015). Lateral spacing in trickle-irrigated wheat: The effects on soil moisture, yield, and water productivity. Field Crops Research, 179: pp.52-62.

Doorenbos, J., & Kassam, AH. (1979). Yield response to water (Irrigation and Drainage Paper No.33). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Elzubeir, A. O. and Mohamed, A. E. (2011). Irrigation scheduling for maize (Zea mays L.) under desert area conditions:North of Sudan. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 2, 645–651.

Ertek A, Sensoy S, Kucukyumuk C, Gedik I. (2006). Determinations of plant-pan coefficients for field-grown eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) using class A pan evaporation values. Agric.Water Manage., 85:58–66.

Ferreira, T. C., and Goncalves, D. A. (2007). Crop-yield/water use production functions of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum, L.) grown under differential nitrogen and irrigation treatments ina hot, dry climate. Agricultural Water Management. 90: 45–55.

Greaves, G. E. and Wang, Y. (2017). Yield response, water productivity, and seasonal water production functions for maize under deficit irrigation water management in southern Taiwan. Plant Production Science, VOL . 20, NO . 4, 353–365

Huang, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, Z. Dai, D and Li, Y. (2022). Evaluation of water use efficiency and optimal irrigation quantity of spring maize in Hetao irrigation district using the Noah-MP Land surface model. Agricultural Water Management. Volume 264, 30.

Irrigation Association [IA]. 2005. Landscape Irrigation Scheduling and Water Management. Available at: http://www.irrigation.org/gov/pdf/IA_LISWM_MARCH_2005.

Igbadun, H. E., A. A. Ramalan and E. Oiganji. 2012. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation and mulch on yield, water use and crop water productivity of onion in Samaru, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Water Management, 109: 162–169.

Karam, F., Breidy, J., Stephan, C., & Rouphael, J. (2003). Evapotranspiration, yield and water use efficiency of drip irrigated maize in the Bekaa Valley of Lebanon. AgriculturalWater Management, 63, 125–137.

Karasu, A., Kuscu, H., Oz, M., and Bayram, G. (2015). The effect of different irrigation water levels on grain yield, yield components and some quality parameters of silage maize (Zea mays indentata Sturt.) in Marmara region of Turkey. Notulae

Karim, T.H., Karim, K. (2001). Water demand of crops at Smaquly Watershed/ Koya. FAO Representation in Iraq. – FAO Coordination Office for Northern Iraq, Erbil. Iraq.

Kiptoo S., Kipkorir E. C and Kiptum C. K. (2019). Effects of deficit irrigation and mulch on yield and quality of potato crop. African Journal of Education, Science and Technology, Vol 4, No. 4:65-77.

Kirnak, H. and Demirtas, N. (2006). Effects of different irrigation regimes and mulches on yield and macronutrition levels of drip-irrigated cucumber under open field conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition , Volume 29, 2006 - Issue 9.

Kuscu, H., Karasu, A., Oz, M., Demir, A. O., & Turgut, I. (2013). Effect of irrigation amounts applied with drip irrigation on maize evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency, and net return in a sub-humid climate. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 18, 13–19.

Lovelli S, Perniola M, Ferrara A, Di Tommaso T (2007). Yield response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agric. Water Manage, 92: 73–80.

Mekonnen, S.A and Sintayehu, A. (2020). Performance evaluation of Sesame under regulated deficit irrigation application in the low land of Western Gondar, Ethiopia International Journal of Agronomy; New York.

Nagaz, K., Masmoudi, M.M., and Mechlia, N.B. (2012).Yield response of drip-ririgated onion under full and deficit irrigation with saline water in arid regions of Tunisia. International Scholarly Research Notices, Volume 2012 |Article ID 562315 | https:// doi.org/10.5402/2012/562315.

Payero, J. O., Tarkalson, D. D., Irmak, S., Davison, D., & Petersen, J. L. (2009). Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on maize evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass. Agricultural Water Management, 96, 1387–1397.

Sarıdas, M.A., Kapur, B., Celiktopuz, E., Sahinar, Y. and Kargi. (2021). Land productivity, irrigation water use efficiency and fruit quality under various plastic mulch colors and irrigation regimes of strawberry in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Agricultural Water Management, Volume 245, 28.

Shrestha, N., Geerts, S., Raes, D.,Horemans, S., Soentjens, S., Maupas, F., & Clouet, P. (2010). Yield response of sugar beets to water stress under Western European conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 346–350.

Suleiman, M.A., Oyebode, N. M. Yahaya1 , U. D. Idris1 and J. O. Ajikashile. (2021). Effect of mulch and deficit irrigation on yield and water use effciciency of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) under gravity drip irrigation. FUW Trends in Science & Technology Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1 pp. 296 – 300

Tufa, K.N., Abebe, Y.A., and Ahmed, F.A.(2022). Effect of deficit irrigation and mulch levels on growth, yield and water productivity of onion ( Allium cepa. L.) at Water Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia, Plant 10(1)26-35.

WMO World Meteorological Organization. (2012). Agrometeorlogy of some selected crops. In Guide to Agricultural Meteorological Practices (GAMP) (2010 ed., pp. 1–128). Geneva: Chair Publications Board.

Xie, Z.K., Y.J. Wang and F.M. Li (2005). Effect of plastic mulching on soil water use and spring wheat yield in arid region of northwest China. Agricultural water management, 75(1): pp.71-83.

Zhang, H., Xiong, Y. Huang, G., Xu, X. and Huang, Q (2017). Effects of water stress on processing tomatoes yield, quality and water use efficiency with plastic mulched drip irrigation in sandy soil of the Hetao Irrigation District. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, vol. 179, issue C, 205-214

.

Published

2023-06-15

How to Cite

Rekawt Rahman Ismaiel, Sherwan Ismail Towfiq, & Tariq hama Karim KakaHama. (2023). Interactive effect of irrigation strategies and mulching on yield, water use efficiency and crop response factor of maize (Zea mays L.) in a semiarid climate. Zanco Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 35(3), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.21271/ZJPAS.35.3.9

Issue

Section

Agricultural and Environmental Researches