Daily Streamflow Prediction for Khazir River Basin Using ARIMA and ANN Models

Authors

  • Abdulwahd A. Kassem Water Resources Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • Adil M. Raheem Surveying Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Alkittab University, Iraq
  • Khalid M. Khidir Water Resources Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Dohuk, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21271/ZJPAS.32.3.4

Keywords:

Forecasting, Streamflow, ARIMA, and ANN.

Abstract

The present study used both Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models for Khazir river basin to simulate the daily flow at Asmawa and Khanis gauge stations. Asmawa station lies on Khazir River while Khanis lies on Gomel River as a tributary of Khazir River. In the stochastic ARIMA model, the Autocorrelation function (ACF) and partial autocorrelation function (PACF) were used to determine how robust the ARIMA model is in predicting the streamflow. In this study, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) formula and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used to evaluate which model is more accurate. The results of this study showed that models of order ARIMA are (2,0,0)(2,1,0) and (2,0,1)(2,1,0) were found much better than the other models for generating and forecasting daily flow time series for aforementioned stations. Coefficients of determination (R2) were found 0.77 and 0.85 for both Asmawa and Khanis stations, respectively. However, two types of ANN models were used for analyzing the daily flow records of the same two aforementioned stations, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF). ANN-MLP model was found to be more accurate than the ANN-RBF for generating and forecasting the daily flow time series as the coefficient of determination provided by ANN-MLP for both stations were 0.83 and 0.85, respectively. In addition, the coefficients of determination produced by the ANN-RBF for both stations were 0.66 and 0.55, respectively. Based on the values of (R2) and (RMSE) obtained in the current work, one can conclude that the ANN-MLP model is the most accurate model among the others in terms of predicting the streamflow for Asmawa station, whereas the performance of both ARIMA and ANN-MLP models for the Khanis station is the same.

References

ABRAHAM, A. 2004. Artificial Neural Networks. In: THORN, P. H. S. A. R. (ed.) Handbook of Measuring System Design. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AL SUHAILI, R. S. H., BAHRAINI, A. & BEHAYA, S. 2014. Artificial Neural Network Modeling for Dynamic Analysis of a Dam-Reservoir-Foundation System. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4.

AL-MASUDI, R. K. 2011. Fitting ARIMA Models for Forecasting to inflow of Dokan Reservoir. Journal of Babylon University, 19.

CHOW, V. T. 1988. Handbook of Applied Hydrology, New York, McGraHill Book Co Inc.

CHOWDHARY, A. & SHRIVASTAVA, R. 2009. RIVER DISCHARGE PREDICTION USING ARTIFICAL NEURAL NETWORK. Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 1275.

CHU, H., WEI, J., LI, J. & LI, T. 2018. Investigation of the relationship between runoff and atmospheric oscillations, sea surface temperature, and local-scale climate variables in the Yellow River headwaters region. HYP Hydrological Processes, 32, 1434-1448.

DREYFUS, G. 2005. Neural networks methodology and applications, Berlin; New York, Springer.

GHIMIRE, B. N. S. 2017. Application of ARIMA Model for River Discharges Analysis. J. Nep. Pnys. Soc. Journal of Nepal Physical Society, 4, 27.

JASSAS, H., KANOUA, W., MERKEL, B., JASSAS, H. & KANOUA, W. 2015. Actual evapotranspiration in the Al-Khazir Gomal Basin (Northern Iraq) using the surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL) and water balance. Geosciences (Switzerland), 5, 141-159.

KHALID, M. K., ADIL, M. R. & SYRAN, A. I. 2018. Stochastic Models for the Maximum and Minimum Daily Flows of Tigris and Khabur Rivers. ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 30(s1), 50-61.

MARQUES, C. A. F., FERREIRA, J. A., ROCHA, A., CASTANHEIRA, J. M., MELO-GONCALVES, P., VAZ, N. & DIAS, J. M. 2006. Singular spectrum analysis and forecasting of hydrological time series. JPCE Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 31, 1172-1179.

MOHAMMADI K., E. H. R. A. S. D. D. 2005. Comparison of Regression, ARIMA and ANN Models for Reservoir Inflow Forecasting using Snowmelt Equivalent (a Case study of Karaj). J. Agric. Sci. Technol, 7, 17-30.

PALIT, A. K. & POPOVIC, D. 2006. Computational Intelligence in Time Series Forecasting: Theory and Engineering Applications.

PANDHIANI, S. M. & SHABRI, A. B. 2015. Time series forecasting by using hybrid models for monthly streamflow data. ams Applied Mathematical Sciences, 9, 2809-2829.

SAMEERA, A. O. 2017. Comparison Between Forecasting ARIMA and ARIMAX Method. ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences Vol. 28, no. 6, 158-65.

SINGH, M., SINGH, R. & SHINDE, V. 2011. Application of Software Packages for Monthly Stream Flow Forecasting of Kangsabati River in India. IJCA International Journal of Computer Applications, 20, 7-14.

SOHAIL, A., WATANABE, K. & TAKEUCHI, S. 2006. Streamflow forecasting by artificial neural network (ANN) model trained by real-coded genetic algorithm (GA)-A case study when the role of groundwater flow component in surface runoff is small,48, 233-262.

SOLIS, J. F., ESMERALDA, P. & JAVIER, L. 2008. Short-term streamflow forecasting: ARIMA vs neural networks. AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS (MATH '08), Harvard, Massachusetts, USA, March 24-26, 2008.

TOTH, E. & BRATH, A. 2000 Flood Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Networks in Black-Box and Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Modeling. Diaksas.

VEIGA, V., HASSAN, Q. & HE, J. 2014. Development of Flow Forecasting Models in the Bow River at Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Water Water, 7, 99-115.

WANG, W. 2006. Stochasticity, nonlinearity and forecasting of streamflow processes.

ZHOU, J., PENG, T., ZHANG, C. & SUN, N. 2018. Data Pre-Analysis and Ensemble of Various Artificial Neural Networks for Monthly Streamflow Forecasting. Water Water, 10, 628.

Published

2020-06-15

How to Cite

Abdulwahd A. Kassem, Adil M. Raheem, & Khalid M. Khidir. (2020). Daily Streamflow Prediction for Khazir River Basin Using ARIMA and ANN Models . Zanco Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 32(3), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.21271/ZJPAS.32.3.4