ڕەسەنایەتی بەڵگەی دیجیتاڵی لە سیستەمی دادوەری تاوانکاریدا ”ڕوانگەی یاسای تاوانکاری لاتینی و ئەنگلۆساکسۆن“

Articles

Bierekoven, C., Bazin, P., & Kozlowski, T. (2014). Electronic Signatures in German, French French and Polish Law Perspective. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 1(0). https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v1i0.1719

Cheng, C. C. C., Shi, C., Gong, N. Z., & Guan, Y. (2021). LogExtractor: Extracting digital evidence from android log messages via string and taint analysis. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 37, 301193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301193

Choi, H., & Lee, S. (2023). Forensic analysis of SQL server transaction log in unallocated area of file system. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 46, 301605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301605

Choi, J. P., & Yang, S. (2021). Investigative journalism and media capture in the digital age. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100942

Dolliver, D. S., Collins, C., & Sams, B. (2017). Hybrid approaches to digital forensic investigations: A comparative analysis in an institutional context. Digital Investigation, 23, 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2017.10.005

Domingues, P., Andrade, L. M., & Frade, M. (2021). Microsoft’s Your Phone environment from a digital forensic perspective. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 38, 301177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301177

Forte, D. (2003). Principles of digital evidence collection. Network Security, 2003(12), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1353-4858(03)00006-0

Forte, D. (2004). The importance of text searches in digital forensics. Network Security, 2004(4), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1353-4858(04)00067-4

Franco, D. (2023). The Importance of Research in Forensic Sciences and Digital Forensics in Contemporary Society. International Journal of Forensic Sciences, 8(4), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.23880/ijfsc-16000336

Harvey, D. J. (2019). Digital Evidence Admissibility: Some Issues. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3505611

Holt, T., & Dolliver, D. S. (2021). Exploring digital evidence recognition among front-line law enforcement officers at fatal crash scenes. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 37, 301167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301167

Horsman, G. (2023). Digital evidence strategies for digital forensic science examinations. Science & Justice, 63(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.11.004

Khan, S., Parkinson, S., & Murphy, C. (2023). Context-based irregular activity detection in event logs for forensic investigations: An itemset mining approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 233, 120991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120991

Makulilo, A. B. (2016). The admissibility of electronic evidence in Tanzania: new rules and case law. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 13(0). https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v13i0.230202

Morelato, M., Cadola, L., Bérubé, M., Ribaux, O., & Baechler, S. (2023). Forensic intelligence teaching and learning in higher education: An international approach. Forensic Science International, 344, 111575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111575

Oparnica, G. (2016). Digital evidence and digital forensic education. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 13(0). https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v13i0.2305

Pedapudi, S. M., & Vadlamani, N. (2023). Digital forensics approach for handling audio and video files. Measurement: Sensors, 29, 100860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2023.100860

Prashant Bhadu. (2021). Admissibility And Perplexity Of Digital Evidence: An Overview. Legal Research Development, 5(IV), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.53724/lrd/v5n4.03

Scanlon, M., Breitinger, F., Hargreaves, C., Hilgert, J.-N., & Sheppard, J. (2023). ChatGPT for digital forensic investigation: The good, the bad, and the unknown. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 46, 301609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301609

Sokol, P., Antoni, Ľ., Krídlo, O., Marková, E., Kováčová, K., & Krajči, S. (2023). Formal concept analysis approach to understand digital evidence relationships. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 159, 108940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2023.108940

Sokol, P., Rózenfeldová, L., Lučivjanská, K., & Harašta, J. (2020). IP Addresses in the Context of Digital Evidence in the Criminal and Civil Case Law of the Slovak Republic. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 32, 300918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.300918

Stoykova, R. (2023). The right to a fair trial as a conceptual framework for digital evidence rules in criminal investigations. Computer Law & Security Review, 49, 105801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105801

Tatulych, I. (2020). Electronic evidence as a means of evidence in civil proceedings. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, 1, 215–219. https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.1.2020.43

Webpages

Rule 1002. Requirement of the Original. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_1002

Rule 1003. Admissibility of Duplicates. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_1003